08.04.21 19:58, ucod...@gmail.com пише:
> I would like to propose adding literal syntax to allow creation of an empty 
> set without the need to call the type constructor. I believe the best choice 
> for such a literal, and one that has been proposed before, is `{,}`.

You can now use `{*()}` as a syntax for empty set.

_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/DOW63RAL3275PWUIAYGMWC5FE66L7HVD/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to