I'm not sure if you're reading the right document, but PEP 634 refers to 636 in its second paragraph
On Tue, 4 May 2021, 19:56 Shreyan Avigyan, <pythonshreya...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok. Now I'm able to understand. PEP 634 should have a reference to PEP 636 > or else it's pretty hard to understand because the syntax section > demonstrates PEG implementation of this. > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org > To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ > Message archived at > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/APKN7AV5TLLNSO3EHLK2MBEEBCB5NMEF/ > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/S5TJBM3TD4X6GUSJI5ERITIZIDCX5536/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
