if you want it for debugging, then static type checkers can do that for you.
2) This would allow another branch of OOP programming to enter Python. > Read-only member variables. There are Private members in Java and C++. Then use Java or C++ -- the benefits of Python are not primarily the syntax, but it's dynamic nature. Though this does bring up an interesting (to the ignorant of most things typing me) question: Do the static type checkers support the concept of private attributes? That might be a nice feature. -CHB ----- Chris Barker Python Language Consulting - Teaching - Scientific Software Development - Desktop GUI and Web Development - wxPython, numpy, scipy, Cython
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/LKOXZWEDKP4PCDH3NUAVZYJFJLANRCGM/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
