El jue, 10 jun 2021 a las 19:30, Cameron Simpson (<c...@cskk.id.au>) escribió:
> On 11Jun2021 10:01, Cameron Simpson <c...@cskk.id.au> wrote: > >So your idea does not suck. But it may not motivate anyone to implement > >it, or even to agreed that it should be implemented. > > It also struck me: functions with _no_ parameters are pretty rare. > > I had a glance through my own code and aside from some closures > (functions within a running function, getting their variables from the > enclosing scope) I've got a few which either access state from some > global or which generate something standalone, eg a primes() function > which just generates the primes starting from 2, a function I maybe even > don't use. They are very few. > I got curious so I checked a large codebase I have access to. Out of 85540 functions, 8244 take no arguments. Many of them are test functions. > > So these seem pretty rare. Just how often do you write such a function > yourself? Got a real world example? > > I'm making an argument that this is already a pretty niche situation > here. > > Cheers, > Cameron Simpson <c...@cskk.id.au> > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org > To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ > Message archived at > https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/UXDUUDLJT4JASMBOM7TJXL36MGD3BYI2/ > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/OX73FEXG5LOGGMBWBIEVU443P55Y3VBA/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/