I'm +1 on deprecation decorator, with some way to represent it so that
it can be determined at runtime (e.g. dunder).


On Thu, 2021-07-29 at 20:52 +0000, Leonardo Freua wrote:
> This is a good example of how using a decorator to express
> depreciation is much better and less polluting the method, as the
> depreciation message doesn't need to be in the method body.
> 
> In my view, it would be interesting for Python to natively have the
> ability to annotate deprecated methods.
> _______________________________________________
> Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
> Message archived at
> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/BVYHXKUUCXD3D2JSSBEIEF2WR2PV2TLI/
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/OSR6OAEHQRXT6FLQE25UHOIM37RFULFH/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to