+1 from me too.
I just had the case yesterday of having to chain a bunch of lists and I
naturally wrote it as [*lst for lst in lst_of_lsts] only to see my IDE complain
:) I've known about itertools.chain() for a while, too. Yet, every time I have
to chain iterables like this, for some reason, maybe because it feels so
natural, this proposed syntax is always my first go-to.
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/G6Z36B5HQ5B4XR272UWJGBSQGX6ICZEC/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
