On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 12:39 AM Stephen J. Turnbull <stephenjturnb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Chris Angelico writes: > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 7:47 PM Stephen J. Turnbull > > <stephenjturnb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > There's also implementing zip's strict argument, eg, > > > > > > def zippymap(func, *iterables, strict=False): > > > return map(lambda x: func(*x), zip(*iterables, strict)) > > > > > > and corresponding zippymappers for any other mappers (including > > > filter). This seems like it might be useful extension to the > > > functions in the stdlib for the same reason that it's useful for zip > > > itself. Even though it's so easy to implement in terms of zip, it > > > would be more discoverable as a documented argument to the functions. > > > > > > Comments? > > > > Given that I don't actually want a pipeline like this, I'm not the > > best one to ask, but I would strongly favour ultra-simple APIs. > > Ah, but I changed the subject here. Sorry about not making that > clear. This isn't a method on a dataflow, it would be a a change to > map itself. >
Oh, oh, gotcha. That may be worth doing, yeah. It doesn't make a lot of sense in the pipeline form, but map() as it currently is could benefit from that. Prior comment withdrawn as it was responding to what you weren't saying :) ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/ALNQ72FHOTZBHLL3N7KPN7WERDWBY2OO/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
