On Fri, Dec 3, 2021 at 12:43 AM David Mertz, Ph.D. <david.me...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 2, 2021 at 3:33 AM Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > But it IS stored! There is no way for it to be evaluated without >> > it >> > being stored! >> > >> I'm not sure I understand you here. How is the late-bound default >> "stored" when one side of a ternary is "not stored"? > > > This seems like dishonest argument. I'm not even sure what point you think > it is making. >
My point was a response to a claim that a late-bound default fundamentally has to be stored somewhere, yet half of a ternary conditional isn't. My point was that there is no difference, and they are both code. Please examine the surrounding context and respond in more detail, rather than calling my argument "dishonest". ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/GYTVMNI6G4SEYCHILT2AKD23T7CD6AUS/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
