On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 1:49 PM David Mertz, Ph.D. <david.me...@gmail.com> wrote: > > That's correct Chris! > > No matter how much you try to change the topic, I was asked how a general > deferred concept would be useful and gave an example. >
I've never denied that it would be useful in general, just that it has nothing to do with PEP 671. So far, I've not seen any examples that have anything to do with function default arguments. Yet you claim that PEP 671 should be rejected on this basis. > An obvious reason to oppose it is that it is a much worse way of writing an > existing sentinel check. This is what I want to see an example of. ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/ZM2TE7W55KJXJHXHBFJXTBRESOKNQMUV/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
