On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 09:44:07AM -0300, Soni L. wrote: > This might be a silly idea but, would it be a good idea to have > ...[a:b:c] return a range(a, b, c)?
Similar ideas have been suggested before: https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/thread/W44PPBJJXETTBQHWCMJB3DRCD6CTXWJT/ https://bugs.python.org/issue42956 What benefit do you see in writing [a:b:c] instead of range(a, b, c)? -- Steve _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/26HCWBERDZKAC5H2A2PAOLIMMPTDPIZW/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
