On Fri, 4 Mar 2022 at 12:10, Christopher Barker <python...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 3, 2022 at 9:58 AM Kevin Mills <kevin.mills...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I actually initially was going to suggest a `strict` flag get added, but I >> figured that would be impractical. I was mostly concerned about classes that >> mimic file objects, because (obviously) their read methods wouldn't include >> a `strict` flag and you couldn't pass such objects to functions using the >> flag. > > you couldn't pass them to functions using a new method, either. > > No matter how you slice it, this would be an extension to the existing > file-like object "protocol" > > I use quotes because I don't think it's a clearly defined protocol.
For what it's worth, there IS a way to slice it that isn't an extension. Create a separate function like this: def read_chunk(f, size): data = f.read(size) while size >= len(data): data += f.read(size - len(data)) return data Stick that into os or something, and then it would work on anything with a read method (and this has been deliberately written to not care whether it's working in characters or bytes). I think it's better as a method, but if there's an issue with extending the protocol, this might be an alternative. ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/CMWVOCW2TYZRD5AG2CUDLP4SAQQI3HDT/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/