On Mon, 7 Mar 2022 at 23:44, Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Not ALL typing changes are just new things in typing.py, so that > doesn't cover everything. And yes, I am sure that a lot of things get > proposed and not implemented - my point is that typing-sig is > successfully finding the good ideas and refining them into actual > code, but python-ideas is 100% shooting ideas to pieces. Bikeshed problem. I barely understand most of the proposals on typing-sig, whereas *everyone* knows what "for..in..if" means (and hence has an opinion). Add to that the fact that the framing of many proposals on python-ideas feels like "here's a neat idea, why doesn't someone (not me) implement it", whereas proposals on typing-sig generally seem to involve an interested party doing a *lot* of work up front, and then summarising that in a proposal, and it's not hard to see why python-ideas is both more accessible for people proposing incompletely thought through ideas, and more hostile towards them... To put it another way, if the culture on python-ideas expected people to do as much up-front work on a proposal as typing-sig seems to (from my experience, at least), there would be far fewer ideas on here, but they would be a lot better, and would be much more likely to be successful. Paul _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/PPDNF7DHJ6WA7KPXTZJYGG7L7N5SV3U5/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
