On Fri, 11 Mar 2022 at 02:20, wfdc via Python-ideas <python-ideas@python.org> wrote:
> If users find themselves re-implementing the same utility function over again > and over again across different projects, it's a good sign that such a > function should be part of the standard library. And yet you haven't demonstrated that this is the case for your proposal (one Stack Overflow question, with a low number of votes, where it's not clear that the OP shouldn't have been using a list in the first place, isn't particularly compelling evidence). Paul _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/2A6GQZJ4G7JZMSIE6M4CU4BQMQJ62XUN/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
