On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 at 05:37, Christopher Barker <python...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > there has STILL been no answer to the questions of "why not
>>
>> use namedtuple" and "why not use a dataclass",
>
>
> The OP may not have, but I at least answered why not namedtuple? very early 
> in the thread
>
> Chris A: sorry to call you out, you weren't particularly harsh, but I had 
> expected that you, of all people, might try extra hard to keep a positive 
> tone in responses to proposals like this.
>
>> and no sample code provided.
>
>
> Yeah, real genuine use cases would be good.

My apologies. The thread has gotten VERY noisy, and I did miss the
fact that you'd said this; partly because the OP has only had
arguments like "namedtuples aren't sequences", which are not what I'd
call compelling. I still stand by the sentiment that sample code from
the OP is more important than someone else's explanation of why
namedtuple might not be suitable, but perhaps the OP sees it as an
answered question.

I've been keeping the tone as positive as possible, but honestly, I
don't think this thread has much hope of being productive at this
point, and if you hadn't called me out specifically, I would not have
responded.

ChrisA
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/HBNI5IEQQ5X4EGKNG5ZSAFBEVGGK4QVQ/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to