On Wed, Mar 23, 2022 at 12:59 AM Jonathan Fine <jfine2...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Does anyone know of any work that's been done to research or make critical > Python code and data smaller so that more of it fits in the CPU cache? I'm > particularly interested in measured benefits. >
I reduced the size of namespace dict in Python 3.11. This will increase the cache efficiency. https://bugs.python.org/issue46845 And I deprecated the cached hash in bytes object. It will removed in Python 3.13 if no objections. Bytes objects are used to bytecode, so this will increase cache efficiency too. Sadly, I can not confirm the benefits. We have macro benchmark (pypeformance), but it is still small. Most hot data fits into L2 cache. Regards, -- Inada Naoki <songofaca...@gmail.com> _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/FSPYHX7PVWSFFVAVTYT575SJR4O6PQH7/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
