On 2022-04-12 11:02, malmiteria wrote:
My proposal would completely detach method resolution from calls to super.
essentially:
```
class A:
val = 1
class B:
val = 2
class C(A,B): pass
C.val # raises an explicitness required error
```
<snip>
If you think you can come up with code that would break under my proposal, hit
me. I wanna have the least amount of breaking change.
You just showed an example in your own message. The behavior of
`C.val` is already defined in that case (it evaluates to 1). If you
change it so it now raises an error, that's a breaking change.
--
Brendan Barnwell
"Do not follow where the path may lead. Go, instead, where there is no
path, and leave a trail."
--author unknown
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/DE5NY7GLE6TPITTF7DW4ASQMKOSYT7JK/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
