On Mon, 2 May 2022 at 17:58, Marc-Andre Lemburg <m...@egenix.com> wrote: > > On 02.05.2022 08:54, Chris Angelico wrote: > > On Mon, 2 May 2022 at 16:46, Serhiy Storchaka <storch...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> 02.05.22 08:03, Chris Angelico пише: > >>> Let's not go as far as a PEP yet, and figure out a couple of things: > >> > >> A PEP is necessary if we add Roman numerals and Cyrillic numerals, and > >> Babylonian cuneiform numerals to the heap. > >> > > > > I'm aware of PEP 313 for Roman, but not for the others. Was there a > > PEP when the int() constructor started to support other types of > > digits? I can't find one but it wouldn't surprise me. > > That was a consequence of PEP 100, the addition of Unicode to the > language. There are now a lot more characters which represent digits > than we had in the 8-bit world.
That's what I thought; there's no specific PEP for that. Thanks. ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/U2XPQO6W6PWZRIVU4ECJEQPFL4G72VQ7/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
