On Wed, 27 Jul 2022 at 08:39, Stanislav Zmiev <szmiev2...@gmail.com> wrote: > 4) If "no" to question 1, is there some other spelling or other small > change that WOULD mean you would use it? (Some examples in the PEP.) > defer keyword that Andre proposed is a better option, in my opinion. However, > I don't like the entire idea so I would argue against that as well. Don't > take it as something bad -- it's a good idea in general but I believe that > it's a step in the wrong direction specifically for python as it is. >
Except that the defer keyword *simply doesn't work* for this use-case. In my opinion, that's a bit of a downside. I posted examples of the problems in the other thread, but there were no replies. ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/SHNMO6PJLGG3ADMAG2Z5CBDK4CGBFE5X/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
