I suspect you wouldn't have to test it all, as it would simply be a trivial
redistribution of a standard (already known-good) generator:

def random_bit_666():
    return int(random() > 2/3)

For other more sophisticated distributions, again simply verify that your
distribution algorithm is correct and let some library function take care
of the randomness.

On Wed, Dec 7, 2022 at 8:23 AM David Lowry-Duda <da...@lowryduda.com> wrote:

> Inspired by the recent thread on PRNG, I began to wonder: suppose that I
> had a pseudorandom number generator that attempted to generate a
> nonuniform distribution. Suppose for instance that it was to generate a
> 0 bit 2/3 of the time, and a 1 bit 1/3 of the time.
>
> How would one go about testing this PRNG against an idealized (similarly
> biased) PRNG?
>
> - DLD
> _______________________________________________
> Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
> Message archived at
> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/YOK7YRFHVUI5TJYPZ23R7JLGGX5YD2U5/
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
>
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- python-ideas@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-ideas-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at 
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/message/ATSW74O2LWS4A7XFDKHCWAPQLXZXILPD/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/

Reply via email to