Yes, Thank you!
So 2 solutions now. They both solve what I have encountered. Beyond that, they
differ by:
a) f-string print(f’{=a.method}’) # ‘a.method’
No new builtin needed.
Simply reprints expression representation.
b) print(nameof(a.method)) # ‘method’
New builtin.
Has its own logic.
Its extra functionality on top of what I have suggested can already
achieved in python via a.method.__name__
I think f-string approach if optimal. It adds new feature, without
functionality overlap and doesn’t crowd the namespace. Also, implementation is
simpler as all what is required seems to be in the place already.
I have little preference regarding syntax, but
f’{=expression}’ does seem to make sense.
Regards,
DG
> On 12 Sep 2023, at 13:14, Valentin Berlier <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Do you mean something like C# nameof()?
> https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/csharp/language-reference/operators/nameof
> _______________________________________________
> Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected]
> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
> Message archived at
> https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/USPQDMEA7ACWH2T56ZYTWBGG7SMT3RIF/
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-ideas.python.org/
Message archived at
https://mail.python.org/archives/list/[email protected]/message/P7KERJ2O5QWON5CZGM5LTMNVP4AZXHSK/
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
