James Andrewartha wrote: > On Mon, 2007-10-22 at 15:05 +0200, Michael Ströder wrote: > >> If you're using ldap.schema you might want to look into using class >> ldap.schema.models.Entry instead of simply ldap.cidict.cidict because >> you don't have to care about attribute description aliases and mapping >> them to OIDs. > > I'm happy with the setup I've got now, but if I ever need to deal with > attribute OIDs then I'll look into it.
Well, it's not a matter of you personally need to deal with it. There might be the case that an attribute type or object class does not have NAME assigned at all. Also think about language sub-types and transfer type ;binary separated by ; from the name. And dashes (-) are allowed in AttributeTypeDescription. You really should dive into RFC 4512. Ciao, Michael. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Python-LDAP-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/python-ldap-dev
