Michael Ströder wrote: > Well, SmartLDAPObject is not well tested nor documented and should probably be > removed anyway... > [..] > Well, tls_cacertfile is simply not used in SmartLDAPObject.__init__(). The > reason is that OpenLDAP libs 2.3 were not able to set connection-specific SSL > options. It should work with OpenLDAP 2.4 under some circumstances but I never > got it working. > > => please either don't use SmartLDAPObject or contribute fixes for it > Personally I'd vote for removing it.
In CVS HEAD I've removed the untested and undocumented wrapper class ldap.ldapobject.SmartLDAPObject completely. Upcoming release 2.3.11 will not contain it anymore. It never worked robustly like intended and it's not worth the effort to fix it. Ciao, Michael. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Planet: dedicated and managed hosting, cloud storage, colocation Stay online with enterprise data centers and the best network in the business Choose flexible plans and management services without long-term contracts Personal 24x7 support from experience hosting pros just a phone call away. http://p.sf.net/sfu/theplanet-com _______________________________________________ Python-LDAP-dev mailing list Python-LDAP-dev@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/python-ldap-dev