In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Adam DePrince <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >I'd like to ask everybody a simple question. How many computer >languages are you completely and utterly fluent in? The reason I ask is >I'd like for everyone who has participated in this discussion to >introspect and ask themselves why they hold the views they do. > >Does your opinion come from a deep understanding of computer languages >as a whole, or is it a reflection of the small list of languages you >happen to know?
Are you referring to current fluency or languages that one has formerly been fluent in? Also, I think that "complete and utter" fluency is a poor target. I think I'm an expert on Python (and I think other people would agree with that assessment ;-), but I certainly don't consider myself to have "complete and utter" fluency. In fact, in some ways my fluency has degenerated now that I'm focusing on writing code for production. -- Aahz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "19. A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing." --Alan Perlis -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
