Le 27/12/04 1:03, « Ishwor » <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > so indeed method 2 (l2.extend() ) is the fastest ?? In 2/3 times, > method 3 (l3 += [x] seems faster than method 1/2 in my P2.4GHZ machine > with 512mb??? :-( > Could u run the code in your machine and perhaps and let me know what > the average speed is??
On a iBook G4 à 1.2 Ghz loaded with tons of other softwares running. fgranger:/develop/python scripts fgranger$ python listspeed.py @@@@@@@ Method 1 done in (average finish time(out of 3)) - 5.6365475655 Method 2 done in (average finish time(out of 3)) - 0.0562076569 Method 3 done in (average finish time(out of 3)) - 0.0455052853 @@@@@@@ fgranger:/develop/python scripts fgranger$ python listspeed.py @@@@@@@ Method 1 done in (average finish time(out of 3)) - 6.1534483433 Method 2 done in (average finish time(out of 3)) - 0.0637686253 Method 3 done in (average finish time(out of 3)) - 0.0500767231 @@@@@@@ fgranger:/develop/python scripts fgranger$ python listspeed.py @@@@@@@ Method 1 done in (average finish time(out of 3)) - 5.5850391388 Method 2 done in (average finish time(out of 3)) - 0.0594174862 Method 3 done in (average finish time(out of 3)) - 0.0549054146 @@@@@@@ -- François Granger [EMAIL PROTECTED] + 33 6 61 36 96 17 (mobile) + 33 1 47 35 00 16 (home) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
