>> [http://www.gotw.ca/publications/concurrency-ddj.htm]. It argues that the >> continous CPU performance gain we've seen is finally over. And that future >> gain would primary be in the area of software concurrency taking advantage >> hyperthreading and multicore architectures. >>
> Well, yes. However, it's not as bad as it looks. I've spent a good part > of my professional life with multiprocessors (IBM mainframes) and > I have yet to write a multi-thread program for performance reasons. > All of those systems ran multiple programs, not single programs > that had to take advantage of the multiprocessor environment. > Your typical desktop is no different. My current system has 42 > processes running, and I'd be willing to bet that the vast majority > of them aren't multi-threaded. > Exactly. If every one of your processes had its own 2 Ghz processor running nothing else, I think you would be pretty happy. Your OS had better be well-written to deal with concurrent access to memory and disks, but I think for general application development there will be huge speed boosts with little need for new programming paradigms. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
