"ajaksu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And to answer your question, I recommend to follow standards because > that's how I call the mixed bag of Recommendations, some of which are > also Specifications, allowing for the inclusion of both significant > Standards and standards. I guess I must've been bitten by the buzzword > bug, sorry it that offends you. But I'm not the only one (TM).
True, but if one follows a document, shouldn't one name it according to how it's named in the document itself? To me, the answer is yes. Especially if people start to claim that "ISO HTML" and HTML 4.01 are identical standards. A lot of people call Python, Perl, etc. *just* scripting languages, not real programming languages (whatever that may be). Should we join their ranks or educate? -- John MexIT: http://johnbokma.com/mexit/ personal page: http://johnbokma.com/ Experienced programmer available: http://castleamber.com/ Happy Customers: http://castleamber.com/testimonials.html -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
