Fredrik Lundh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Sion Arrowsmith wrote:
>> I think there's something weird going on -- sp4 should be making
>> 154563 calls to str.split. So no wonder it goes faster -- it's not doing
>> any work.
>the problem is that he's using a Python-level profiler to benchmark things
>written
>in C.
>
>(you cannot really use "profile" to *benchmark* things written in Python
>either; the
>profiler tells you where a given program spends the time, not how fast it is
>in com-
>parision with other programs)
Hmm. Playing around with timeit suggests that although split() *is*
faster than split("\t"), it's fractional, rather than the OP's four
times faster. Is the overhead of profile keeping track of calls in
Python getting in the way? (Not having used profile -- hence my
confusion.) And why can map() keep everything at the C level when
the list comprehension can't?
--
\S -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- http://www.chaos.org.uk/~sion/
___ | "Frankly I have no feelings towards penguins one way or the other"
\X/ | -- Arthur C. Clarke
her nu becomeþ se bera eadward ofdun hlæddre heafdes bæce bump bump bump
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
