Tim Peters schrieb:
> 
> O() notation isn't being used

I was replying to Gabriel's post:

 >>>>> In fact it's the other way - losing a factor of 2 is irrelevant,
 >>>>> O(2N)=O(N). The logN factor is crucial here.

Regards,
Jo
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to