"Jaroslaw Zabiello" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> + SqlObject allows working with the DB tables without >> using SQL itself. > > Rails has ActiveRecord ORM, which IMO has nicer and simpler > syntax than SQLObject. Rails has migrations, TB - not (Migrations is > versioning system for evolving database schema)
TG supports SQL Alchemy as well. With SQL Alchemy I believe you'll have a better experience than with Rails' ORM. With regards to Migrations, SQL Object does support something like that, but you have to explicitly code it and then you can run sqlobject-admin upgrade (or the equivalente tg-admin sql upgrade, since it is a wrapper...). > But rhtml is much more flexible because it can generate *any content*, > not only xml. But Rails has THREE template systems: rhtml (main), rxml > (for rss and xml generation) and rjs (for javascript and AJAX). Well, TG has a few templating systems... MarkUp, Kid, Cheetah, ZPT, and others. You can choose the one that best fits your needs / brain. You can even have multiple template systems used depending on what was requested for the same controller... Which one is better isn't of my concern. I've already tested then and decided what I want to use. The best thing is try them and see what works. You don't have to choose only one -- but you have to use one per project to make it less messy ;-) -- Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
