Maric Michaud wrote: > Le lundi 04 septembre 2006 13:48, Carl Banks a écrit : > > Essentially, it's objects that have MROs, not classes. > Wrong, __mro__ is an attribute of types (subtypes of type) but like __class__ > it is not available in the instances. > mro() is standard a method of type.
I agree that was misleading; I should have said something like, "Type of an object never changes, therefore the MRO used for an object is fixed." BTW, __class__ is available to instances. (Were you thinking of __bases__?) Carl Banks -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
