Terry Reedy wrote:
> "Bruno Desthuilliers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> The current namespace object, of course.
>
> Implementing a namespace as a Python object (ie, dict) is completely
> optional and implementation dependent. For CPython, the local namespace of
> a function is generally *not* done that way.
I know this, and that's not the point here. The op's question seemed to
imply that the hypothetical __assign__ method should belong to the rhs
object, which is obviously not the case - it must of course belongs to
the lhs 'object'.
--
bruno desthuilliers
python -c "print '@'.join(['.'.join([w[::-1] for w in p.split('.')]) for
p in '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'.split('@')])"
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
