Kenneth McDonald wrote: > This is possible with pure Python classes. Just add the method as new > attribute of the class. However, that won't work for the builtins. > > I know that this is somewhat dangerous, and also that I could subclass > the builtins, but not being able to do things like '[1,2,3]'.length > drives me a little nuts. Python is about the only computer language I > use, and I think it's certainly the best of the scripting languages, but > there are inconsistencies in the object model and some other things I > wish I could fix. If could could modify the builtins this way, I'd be > willing to take the risk. > > Thanks, > Ken
Hi Ken, The reason comes from code being read much more than it is written. It makes it much easier to maintain code if some foundations i.e. the builtins, don't change. That way everyone maintaining the code will know that an int is an int, is an int, wherever it may be in the source files of your program. The flip-side is that someone reading List in athers code knows it isn't the built-in list type and so is on-guard for any deviations/additions. As for your irritation Ken, if you have to maintain code, as I do/have done, then you remember how many times little inconsistencies have tripped you up in the past, and offset those gripes against things like this. - cheers, Paddy. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
