Dustan wrote: > Alright, I can see I'm a bit outvoted here. I tried your suggestions > and it worked fine. > > I'll also try to consider in the future that part of the problem might > be lack of information conveyed on my part.
If you insist on one-liners, it can be done without sum(), though it probably doesn't buy you much in readability: from itertools import chain [list(chain(*row)) for row in foo] By the way, if this was not a toy example and you're doing serious work with n-dimensional arrays, make yourself a favor and install NumPy; it's usually both faster and more elegant for array manipulations than pure python. George -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
