John Reese wrote: > It seems like it would be clear and mostly backwards compatible if the > + operator on any iterables created a new iterable that iterated > throught first its left operand and then its right, in the style of > itertools.chain.
you do know that "iterable" is an informal interface, right? to what class would you add this operation? </F> -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
