Romulo A. Ceccon wrote: > George Sakkis wrote: > > > If you actually intend to > > 1) name your Event subclasses Evt1, Evt2, ... EvtN and not give more > > descriptive (but unrelated to the magic event number) names > > No, those names are just an example. The actual classes have > descriptive names.
Even then, I'd prefer a naming convention plus a global Event registry than relying on inspect, both for implementation and (mostly) documentation reasons. It's good if a human can browse through a list of a few dozen names and immediately know that CamelCasedNameEndingWithEvent is an Event subclass. It's also good to be able to find in one place the explicit mapping of magic numbers to classes rather than searching in the whole file (or worse, multiple files) for it. YMMV. George -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
