alf wrote: > Hi, > is there a more elegant way to get o.__class__.__name__. For instance I > would imagine name(o). > decided to stick to o.__class__.__name__ for readibility.
-- alfz1 -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
alf wrote: > Hi, > is there a more elegant way to get o.__class__.__name__. For instance I > would imagine name(o). > decided to stick to o.__class__.__name__ for readibility.
-- alfz1 -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list