Sam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> skriver:
> On 13 Feb 2007 17:51:00 GMT, Jorgen Grahn
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Well, C++ is a better language than C in many ways. So, if he needs to learn
>> one of them, why does it have to be C?
>>
>> Another reason some people choose C++ over Python for some tasks is that
>> they feel that larger programs benefit from strong, static type checking.
>> I like both ways, but depending on the task, one or the other is better.
>
> C++ is -not- strongly typed. You can cast anything to void *, and
> manipulate it in ways unimaginable. Plus there's the whole mess that
> is pointer arithmetic and a weak typesystem...


C++ can be both, The type systenm is as fragila as you like it to be.
I mainlty use c++ when i the need stronger typing that Python och C
can't give me. In some ways it's even stronger types than languanges
as Java and ObjectiveC. C++ it however at least four different
languanges, in one ball of soupe.

And yes you can do it, that doesn't mean you have to dio it. As
_functions in python or __, you can use them from anyware, you don't
have to.

/ Balp


-- 
http://anders.arnholm.nu/                            Keep on Balping
-- 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to