Schüle Daniel wrote:
> Steven Bethard schrieb:
>> Schüle Daniel wrote:
>>> it would be nice feature to have builtin literal for set type
>>> maybe in P3 .. what about?
>>> s = <1,2,3>
>>
>> In Python 3.0, this looks like::
>>
>> s = {1,2,3}
>
> jepp, that looks not bad .. as in a mathe book.
> the only disadvantage I see, that one may confuse it with a dict.
Perhaps with a very cursory inspection. But the lack of any ':'
characters is a pretty quick clue-in.
STeVe
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
