On Feb 16, 4:07 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Feb 16, 3:28 pm, "Gabriel Genellina" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > That's ok inside the same process, but the OP needs to use it "from a > > subprocess or spawn". > > You have to use something like tee, working with real file handles. > > I'm not particularly familiar with this, but it seems to me that if > you're trying to catch stdout/stderr from a program you can call with > (say) popen2, you could just read from the returned stdout/stderr > pipe, and then write to a series of file handles (including > sys.stdout). > > Or am I missing something? =) > > ~G
That works, but it isn't live streaming of stdout/stderr. Most of the time, if you stream both, one could lock the process, or have the stdout/stderr printed in the wrong order. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
