Alan Franzoni wrote:
> I would assume then, that if the '+=' operator
> is assumed to modify objects in-place, it would just fail on immutable
> objects, wouldn't I?
Then you wouldn't be able to do things like
x = 3
x += 1
which would result in howls of outrage from the
*other* half of the Python community.
The x += y syntax is designed to fill two different
but equally useful roles: one is to modify objects
in-place, the other is to be a short hand for
x = x + y.
This was all discussed at *very* great length many
years ago, and the addition of in-place operators
to the language was held up for a long time until
the present compromise was devised. You might not
like it, but it's here to stay.
--
Greg
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
