On Mar 15, 3:45 am, Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Paul Boddie wrote: > > On 14 Mar, 16:15, Stefan Behnel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> metaperl wrote: > >>> Without even checking them all out, I'm thinking the Amara XML Toolkit > >>> must be the most feature-packed. > >> Please check out lxml before you post FUD like this. > > >>http://codespeak.net/lxml/ > > > Calm down, Stefan! The inquirer must have got the impression of > > Amara's superiority from somewhere; all you need to do is to discover > > which resource gave that impression and balance the situation out. In > > any case, it's an opinion: there's no fear involved, and the only > > uncertainty and doubt are in the inquirer's mind, which I suppose is > > why they posted the inquiry. > > Although the phrase "without even checking them all out" hardly lends > credence to the OP's assertion of Amara's superiority, and does tend to > support a hypothesis involving some ulterior motive (or would if less > ingenuously done). >
Given keywords like "Amara" and "Elementtree" and past history, it looked to me like a troll of one kind trying to incite a troll of another kind to pop out from under the bridge and chew on his ankle :-) -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
