Eric S. Johansson wrote:
> Peter Otten wrote:
>> Eric S. Johansson wrote:
>>
>> [in private mail -- please don't, Eric]
>
> sorry. my preference is for private mail. it's my way of trying to be
> kind to others by reducing list clutter.
It is not list clutter in my book; it gives others the chance to correct,
add to, or even profit from our conversation.
>> I don't understand. The logging package detects the function name without
>> user intervention.
> not in 2.4 afaik.
Hmm, I must have overread that constraint in your previous posts...
Here is yet another revision of my example then:
import logging
import sys
class LoggedType(type):
def __new__(mcl, name, bases, classdict):
def get_logger(self):
return logging.getLogger("%s.%s" % (name,
sys._getframe(1).f_code.co_name))
classdict["_%s__logger" % name] = property(get_logger)
return type.__new__(mcl, name, bases, classdict)
class Logged:
__metaclass__ = LoggedType
class Felis(Logged):
def alpha(self):
self.__logger.info("Felis.alpha")
def gamma(self):
self.__logger.info("Felis.gamma")
class Catus(Felis):
def alpha(self):
self.__logger.info("Catus.alpha")
def beta(self):
self.__logger.info("Catus.beta")
if __name__ == "__main__":
logging.basicConfig(
format="EXPECTED %(message)s GOT %(name)s", level=logging.INFO)
f = Felis()
f.alpha()
f.gamma()
c = Catus()
c.alpha()
c.beta()
c.gamma()
Peter
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
