On Apr 11, 10:56 am, Robert Kern <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Others have given good answers. I would only like to clarify what I think is > the > source of confusion here. While the FSF and many open source advocates make a > distinction between the words "commercial" (meaning that someone derives money > from distributing the software, whether it is GPLed or not) and "proprietary" > (meaning that the software is not being distributed under an open source > license > but one that restricts user's rights), Trolltech abuses the term "commercial" > to > mean "proprietary" in this case.
Ok, i see...So i can use Qt OS edition and earn money from this as long as i explicitly say (is a reference to a GPL in a readme text file enough for this ?) that this software is under the GPL lisence and i have the obligation to give the source code with it. I will reply to that email of Trolltec's today and i will tell them about the things mentioned here, basically just the sentence i wrote above. I see what they will reply and post it here... -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
