Martin v. Löwis wrote: > 7stud schrieb: >> I have a hard time believing I am the first one to notice those >> omissions. Are the docs just old and poorly maintained? Or, is there >> some reason those methods were omitted? > > You are likely the first one to notice, and then talk about that. > > It often happened in the past that patches were admitted which don't > simultaneously update the documentation, hence they diverge. These > days, patches are regularly rejected for not providing proper > documentation changes. > > As you now found a difference, please write a patch and submit it > to sf.net/projects/python. > Please note that the documentation patch doesn't need to be in the Latex source format used to produce the docs - editors will add any necessary markup.
regards Steve -- Steve Holden +1 571 484 6266 +1 800 494 3119 Holden Web LLC/Ltd http://www.holdenweb.com Skype: holdenweb http://del.icio.us/steve.holden ------------------ Asciimercial --------------------- Get on the web: Blog, lens and tag your way to fame!! holdenweb.blogspot.com squidoo.com/pythonology tagged items: del.icio.us/steve.holden/python All these services currently offer free registration! -------------- Thank You for Reading ---------------- -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list