Christos TZOTZIOY Georgiou wrote:
On Sat, 12 Feb 2005 16:01:26 -0800, rumours say that Michael Spencer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> might have written:
OK - then my entry is: assert obj+1 >= 1 :-)
So -1 is not a number.
At least not a legal one for Steven's function as I understood it
No, -1 is still a "number" for my particular case.
Basically, I want "numbers" to be valid upper bounds to an increasing sequence of integers. This means that "numbers" must be comparable to integers and must behave properly as upper bounds to integers. More formally:
If n is a "number" (in my particular sense), then there exists an integer i such that i > n, and for all integers i such that i > n and for all positive integers x, i + x > n.
STeVe -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
