Steve Howell wrote: > --- Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I think I would rewrite the current unit-testing >> example to use the >> standard library unittest module:: >> >> # Let's write reusable code, and unit test it. >> def add_money(amounts): >> # do arithmetic in pennies so as not to >> accumulate float errors >> pennies = sum([round(int(amount * 100)) for >> amount in amounts]) >> return float(pennies / 100.0) >> import unittest >> class TestAddMoney(unittest.TestCase): >> def test_float_errors(self): >> self.failUnlessEqual(add_money([0.13, >> 0.02]), 0.15) >> self.failUnlessEqual(add_money([100.01, >> 99.99]), 200) >> self.failUnlessEqual(add_money([0, >> -13.00, 13.00]), 0) >> if __name__ == '__main__': >> unittest.main() >> > > Just a minor quibble, but wouldn't you want the import > and test class to only get executed in the ___main__ > context?
That would be fine too. In the real world, I'd put the tests in a different module. STeVe -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list