[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Martelli) wrote in news:1i27mku.1sc8l3x1dda3crN% [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> Bruno Desthuilliers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> Alex Popescu a écrit : > > [... snip ...] > > > The mere check of whether an object possesses some important special > method is best accomplished through the abstract-base-classes machinery > (new in Python 3.0: see <http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3119/>). At > this time there is no Callable ABC, but you're welcome to argue for it > on the python-3000 mailing list (please do check the archives and/or > check privately with the PEP owner first to avoid duplication). > This PEP sounds very similar to Java interfaces (well, as an enhanced version as you are allowed to programmatically control this inheritance chain). Interesting approach. And now I can agree that the removal of callable() makes sense! Thanks a lot for the pointer Alex. ./alex -- .w( the_mindstorm )p. > > Alex >
-- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
