Martin v. Löwis wrote: >>> (2) it is a interpretation language >> Not quite. It's compiled to byte-code - just like Java (would you call >> Java an 'interpreted language' ?) > > Python is not implemented like Java. In Java (at least in HotSpot), > the byte code is further compiled to machine code before execution; > in Python, the byte code is interpreted. > OK, good. Naive question now comming to mind: Why doesn't Python do the latter as well?
/W -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
