exhuma.twn a écrit :
> This is something that keeps confusing me. If you read examples of
> code on the web, you keep on seeing these three calls (super, apply
> and __init__) to reference the super-class. This looks to me as it is
> somehow personal preference. But this would conflict with the "There
> one way to do it" mind-set.
apply is deprecated. Chances are that code using it is somewhat old.
super came with the new object model in Python 2.2.1 (IIRC), and is only
useful for some corner cases involving multiple inheritence . Directly
calling the superclass's method (__init__ or whatever) is the canonical
way in the most common cases.
And BTW, the sentence is "there *should* be one - and *preferably* only
one - *obvious* way to do it" (emphasis is mine). In this case, there's
_at least_ one way do to do it, and only one (direct call) is really
obvious IMHO !-)
> So, knowing that in python there is one thing to do something, these
> three different calls must *do* domething different.
Indeed. But mostly because you managed to get 2 examples wrong !-)
> But what exactly
> *is* the difference?
>
> ------------ Exampel 1: -----------------------------
>
> class B(A):
> def __init__(self, *args):
> A.__init__(self, args)
You want:
class B(A):
def __init__(self, *args):
A.__init__(self, *args)
> ------------ Exampel 2: -----------------------------
>
> class B(A):
> def __init__(self, *args):
> apply( A.__init__, (self,) + args)
is the same as the previous, using the deprecated apply function.
> ------------ Exampel 3: -----------------------------
>
> class B(A):
> def __init__(self, *args):
> super(A,self).__init__(*args)
>
You want:
class B(A):
def __init__(self, *args):
super(B,self).__init__(*args)
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
