In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, David Kastrup <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bent C Dalager) writes:
>
>> I have never claimed equivalence. What I have made claims about are
>> the properties of one of the meanings of a word. Specifically, my
>> claim is that "free" is a reasonable description of some one or some
>> thing that has been "liberated".
>
>But it suggests that the natural state would be the unfree state.
Would this be a good thing? Would it be a bad thing? What is your
point?
Cheers
Bent D
--
Bent Dalager - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.pvv.org/~bcd
powered by emacs
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
